I normally try to stay up-beat on this blog. However, Halloween seems like an appropriate time to focus on what may be the single most frightening aspect of the challenge we face, when confronting global warming: that the US national government is NOT going to get us where we need to be single-handedly. Don't get me wrong; I'm not saying you should stop calling and writing to your members of Congress - it's extremely important to keep that up, because that's the only way we will get anything at all out of the national government. In fact, the Senate and House of Representatives are poised to vote very soon on this year's Energy Bill, and this is a great time to contact the officials who are supposed to be representing you - you can get more information on that from the Sierra Club. The problem is, though, that even if the best-case-scenario bill is passed, the provisions it contains will not even come close to doing what really needs to be done to stop climate change. For instance, the best-case-scenario bill would raise fuel economy standards for vehicles to 35 mpg; that would be the first raise in fuel-efficiency to take place in years, and I sincerely hope it happens - however, the truth is that we need so much more. If the federal government began an aggressive campaign to raise average fuel economy for vehicles to, say, 100 mpg (a standard that is not impossible to reach, by the way), then they would be beginning to take global warming seriously. But 35 mpg? It's a step, but a very, very, small step.
It is highly unlikely that the national government will get us out of this mess. The problem is that Congress moves at a glacial pace when it comes to environmental issues (though they somehow manage to launch new wars quite quickly), and we simply don't have that much time. Big things need to happen in the next ten years, or sooner, if catastrophic climate change is to be avoided.
What this is leading to, of course, is the importance of action at lower levels of government. States like California (and to a slightly lesser degree, Oregon), are already miles ahead of the national government on global warming. And of course, cities and counties are moving forward too - we need to keep pushing for more change, and holding mayors, city councilors, and county commissioners accountable to the promises they make. There is even a role for the national government in a future where states and local governments turn out to be the real leaders on climate change. Not all 50 states are as on-top of things as California, and what Congress may be able to do is keep more backward places, like Texas, from getting too much worse. Even if Congress isn't going to cut back on emissions very drastically, it's not unrealistic to think they might put a ban on new coal plants. This would make it harder for governments like Texas to wipe away progress made in other areas. With the national government at least limiting damage done by the likes of Texas, the majority of our states taking real strides toward cutting emissions, and local governments complementing the work done by states, we could make real progress. It would still be a major challenge, but not an insurmountable one. So be scared, this Halloween - but don't give up hope.
November 3rd, 2007 will be the second national Step It Up 2007 event in the US, designed to bring climate change to the attention of our elected officials. Step It Up 1, which was held last spring, marked the most successful day of anti-global warming action this country has seen so far; Step It Up 2 should be just as much of a hit, with actions being organized all across the United States. And for the November Step It Up, the Cool Washington County campaign will be holding an event outside the Washington County Administrative Building, asking the Board of Commissioners to pass the Cool Counties Declaration. Stop by on November 3rd, and add your voice to the movement!
Also, if you haven't already, please SIGN THE PETITION TO THE BOARD, asking them to pass the Cool Counties Declaration!
This may well be the first anti-global warming demonstration ever to hit the streets of Downtown Hillsboro. I myself, and other student activists at Pacific University, Forest Grove, are organizing the event, and will be outside the County Administrative Building from 11:00am to 2:00pm on November, with home-made signs and a banner or two asking for 80% reductions in greenhouse emissions by the year 2050. The event will be peaceful, and absolutely legal. It will be a Saturday, so the commissioners will not actually be in their offices, but they will be invited to stop by and talk to us about how they plan to move forward on a comprehensive emissions-reduction plan. And whether or not any of the commissioners show up, there should be plenty of WA County citizens on Main Street, Hillsboro, early on a Saturday afternoon. Our message will be heard, regardless of whether anyone from the Board of Commissioners chooses to attend.
If you want to be part of this event, please RSVP by leaving a response on this blog, or by clicking on the "contact me" link to the right. I need to know how many people are coming, so that I can let the City of Hillsboro know; remember, we're doing everything legally, here.
Note: the picture used on this post comes from the Step It Up website, at http://stepitup2007.org/
-Nick
Today the Washington County Board of Commissioners received at least ten emails from students and faculty at Pacific University, urging them to pass the US Cool Counties Climate Stabilization Declaration. This event came on the tail of a message I received from Chairman Tom Brian of the Board of Commissioners, about a week ago. The gist of Chairman Brian's email was that I should shut up about the Cool Counties Declaration, and be satisfied with the fact that the county has built a LEED certified building or two, and supports public transportation. I was very grateful for his message, actually; I took Chairman Brian's arguments, turned them around, and used them as ammunition against the county's a-little-is-enough policy when laying out talking points for today's email-senders at Pacific University.
If you haven't already, please SIGN THE PETITION TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, asking them to pass the Cool Counties Declaration!
What the Board of Commissioners needs to realize is that "small steps" to reduce global warming pollutants must be accompanied by a comprehensive plan that will bring emissions down from the community as a whole. Isolated projects will do us little good if the total volume of pollutants continues to go up. Today's email-sending event was just the beginning of a full-scale campaign directed at the Board of Commissioners, in response to their refusal to take the Cool Counties Declaration seriously. The county must pass the Declaration, and bring total emissions down!
-Nick
The word “crisis” has become over-used in our society. The term has lost some of its power, because people are so used to hearing it. So when many of us hear a phrase like “global crisis,” or “planetary crisis,” is it any surprise that the meaning doesn’t really sink in? We are so used to hearing about disasters, that one more catastrophe hardly seems like big news.
But what does “planetary crisis” really mean? What does it mean for those of us here in Oregon, and for the public officials we have elected to represent us? The world-wide crisis that I refer to is, of course, the environmental crisis—and specifically the crisis of global warming. It is a problem for which all of us bear some responsibility; but before we can act, as a people, to overcome it, we have to understand what a “planetary crisis” really means. For one thing, it is truly planetary in nature, with potential to effect each and every square mile of the Earth. This is different from a national crisis like problems with social security, or the national debt. It is possible for individuals to escape a country whose economy is collapsing due to debt; but there is no place on Earth that will not be touched by global warming.
So, a planetary crisis is global in extent—it affects the whole world. However, that definition still does not touch on the second part of the term: the word “crisis,” itself. For a community, a government, or a civilization, a “crisis,” must be considered different from just another “issue” to debate and to act on. Today, global warming seems to be an “issue” almost everywhere; it is more talked about than ever before, and is worrying everyone from economists to family farmers. In many circles, climate change is even considered an “important issue”—one that requires much more than minimal attention. But have most decision-makers realized that global warming is truly a “crisis”? I think not.
Which brings us to Washington County. Climate change is certainly an issue here; it may even be an “important issue.” But a crisis? In the words of Chairman of the Board of Commissioners Tom Brian, “Washington County engages in an increasing number of environmentally sound practices from “green” building codes….to building a LEED Gold headquarters for Clean Water Services….to being the initiator and lead advocate for the Drive Less, Save More program, Commuter Rail and many other programs.” Chairman Brian seems to think this is enough—that the county is doing its full part to combat global warming already. But is this really true? A crisis is a problem so large, and so imminent, that it must be acted on immediately, if truly catastrophic results are to be avoided. This global crisis is a junction in history that calls on us all to transform our way of life, to make choices—and make them immediately—that will preserve this planet in a state as hospitable to civilization as it has been in the past. This crisis is a now-or-never moment; we either act now, and do so with the determination to overcome all obstacles—or we lose our chance forever.
Is Washington County meeting our crisis head-on? Certainly, it is taking positive steps. But at their current pace, they will not get us where we need to be fast enough. Washington County takes global warming seriously, but not as seriously as it needs to be taken. A few LEED certified buildings represent a good start, but actions like these must be accompanied by a regional plan for bringing down total greenhouse emissions; there must be a strategy in place for reducing pollutants from the community as a whole. With a plan like this, LEED certified buildings and programs to encourage public transportation become part of a much wider goal—a means of fulfilling tangible progress that reduces the area’s overall contribution to the crisis. Without such a plan, however, isolated efforts to build a few energy-efficient buildings here, or promote recycling there, lose much of their meaning. They become noble gestures—but, perhaps, little more than gestures, all the same.
Last spring, the City of Hillsboro, one of the largest municipalities in Washington County, formally recognized this reality. The city council unanimously passed a resolution calling for implementation of a comprehensive plan that would bring down emissions from the community as a whole. The city’s many already-existing sustainability initiatives will be an essential part of the plan’s success, and will be complemented by future actions taken to bring Hillsboro closer to its emission-reduction goals. Now the Washington County government needs to come to this same realization. It is time to take a cue from Hillsboro—and from nearby Portland, which has even more extensive emissions-reduction plans. Small, isolated steps make a good start. But, alone, they will not get us out of a crisis.
-Nick
Two days ago, I sent a final email to the Washington County Board of Commissioners, warning that the lack of response from any member of the Board except Dick Schouten was going to necessitate a ramping-up in the Cool Washington County campaign, which would include some public actions that might not put the current county government in a very good light. The next day, surprisingly, I actually received two emails in response to my message. One was from County Administrator Robert Davis, offering to talk about the Cool Counties Declaration and its implications for Washington County. I hope this conversation actually happens; I am currently for a phone call from Mr. Davis.
PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION TO THE BOARD, ASKING THEM TO PASS THE COOL COUNTIES DECLARATION
Meanwhile, I received another email, last night, from Chairman Tom Brian. Chairman Brian's message was not very...er...encouraging. The chair of the Washington County Board doesn't understand the Cool Counties Declaration, or what it is really about. And instead of responding to my messages over a month ago with his concerns, he chose to wait until now, when the campaign has gathered enough momentum to seem, I think, somewhat threatening to someone who doesn't really get it. He sent me a long list of worries about money, staff time, and the like; believe it or not, Chairman Brian, I saw all that coming, and am well aware of the challenges the county will face in becoming a true Cool County. That does not detract from the environmental imperative to set tangible goals for reducing greenhouse emissions.
If Chairman Brian thought he would discourage the Cool Washington County campaign by bringing up a few problems that I anticipated long ago, he was sorely mistaken. This Monday, at a Pacific University event, Pacific students who attend will be sending emails to the entire Board of Commissioners, about Cool Counties. I have finally received some kind of response from the Board, and this campaign is just beginning in earnest.
-Nick
The "Cool Washington County" petition continues to be available on-line, and signatures are slowly building up. If you haven't signed it yet, then PLEASE DO SO HERE! It is especially important right now to keep the signatures coming, because most members of the Board of Commissioners have been declining to respond to my emails. With the notable exception of our supporter Commissioner Dick Schouten, it seems that members of the Board are not taking the Cool Counties Declaration very seriously.
That said, every campaign has setbacks, and I am confident that this one will recover. Someday in the not-too-distant future, the Cool Counties Declaration will have it's day in Washington County. And meanwhile, other counties across the country are jumping on-board the movement - 21 governments have now passed the Declaration, and become official Cool Counties. The states of Washington and California now each have multiple Cool Counties; so far, Washington County still has a chance to become the first in Oregon, but that opportunity isn't likely to last long. Meanwhile, as Cool Counties takes off, the total number of Cool Cities in the US is fast-approaching 700. Our federal government may be stalling attempts to seriously address global warming, but not so our local governments. Cities and Counties are truly in the thick of the environmental movement.
Again, PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION to the WA County Board of Commissioners!
-Nick
Those of us in Oregon are lucky to live in the same state as one of the most spectacular (and successful) environmental experiments in this country: the City of Portland. Portland is famous in ecological circles for its efforts to blend sustainability with economic growth, and for being one of the first large cities in the US to bring total greenhouse emissions below 1990 levels. While the rest of the country has grown dirtier, more polluting, and more environmentally destructive, Portland has shown that it is possible to have a vibrant economy and be environmentally conscious at the same time.
Portland's reductions in greenhouse emissions are impressive in themselves. Perhaps the single most important thing about the city's efforts, though, is that it represents an example that other communities can follow. Along with a few other major US cities, such as Seattle and San Francisco, Portland has been testing out strategies for shifting energy consumption away from fossil fuels, dramatically cutting waste, and even maintaining a healthy "urban forest" that absorbs some of the carbon emitted by the city. Portland's efforts are not just to be admired; they should be duplicated by local governments all across the country, and especially right here in Oregon. The Portland Area's many suburbs are in an especially good position to start building on Portland's success; they are close enough to observe what happens in Portland directly, and possibly even work with the very people who made Portland the environmentally friendly place it is. Why not take a major urban area, like Washington County, and start transforming it into the next Portland, environmentally speaking?
It would be a major undertaking, to achieve what Portland has in terms of sustainability and reducing greenhouse emissions. However, we have lots of resources to draw from. Not only is WA County right next door to Portland itself, but organizations like ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability have the tools to help cities, and the county government itself, asses exactly what needs to be done to bring global warming pollutants down. The US Cool Counties Initiative provides county governments with a checklist to go through as they begin looking at all the opportunities for reducing emissions. Becoming the next Portland would be a challenge - there's no doubt about that. But with the county government, the area's major cities, and various environmental organizations all working together, it is something we could really do.
Indeed, in the next few years local governments all over the country must begin to really follow Portland's example. I'm not talking about slightly expanding recycling options, or even about just replacing traffic signal lights with efficient LED bulbs. No, more drastic measures are needed if we are going to stave off global warming. Overall emissions from entire communities must be brought down, as Portland has brought them down. There is no question about this; what is open to question is which local governments will be the first to take Portland's example seriously, and bring emissions down significantly. WA County and the cities within it are in a prime position to become environmental leaders. It's up to us to make sure they take advantage.
If you haven't already, please SIGN THE PETITION TO THE WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, asking them to pass the Cool Counties Declaration!
And I encourage you to check out the Cool Counties webpage - some new counties have recently been added, although still none from Oregon.
engel
Student at Pacific University
Hillsboro, OR USA
ENGEL: Environmental ethics; New leadership; Green development; Economic sustainability; Local action! As a student activist, I am working to bring attention to global warming in Oregon. Most of my work takes place at the local level; I have convinced my own city of Hillsboro, OR, to sign onto the US Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, and I am now working to get Washington County, OR to sign onto the county-level version of this same pledge. On my blog ENGEL (acronym explained above), I report on local government actions all over the state which either help or hinder the climate movement; there are lots of opportunities for readers of this blog to help contribute to the climate movement by making their voices heard; whether in city or county governments, at school, or anywhere else. Please help me make change in Oregon! -Nick
June 2008 (1)
April 2008 (3)
March 2008 (7)
February 2008 (5)
January 2008 (10)
December 2007 (10)
November 2007 (10)
October 2007 (7)
September 2007 (9)
August 2007 (6)
July 2007 (8)
June 2007 (1)