A funeral and a celebration: grim clouds over Dalian
I arrived in Dalian on the day of the funeral for firefighter Zhang Liang, who drowned beneath the thick crude when his crew jumped into the ocean — without safety gear — to attempt, in vain, to fix an underwater pipe. Our lead photographer, Jiang He, who by now has reached legendary status globally for capturing the final seconds of Zhang's life, continued to cover the very emotional moments of this oil spill disaster.
Colleagues described how over 30,000 people lined the streets of Dalian to honor Zhang. And judging from Jiang He’s photos, there were many outpourings of grief for his untimely death, at the age of 25. People talked about whispers of anger from Dalian residents and firefighters against the corporations responsible for this tragic human and environmental disaster. And of their utter callousness: in the evening of the same day, a fancy celebratory dinner was held in one of Dalian’s classiest hotels for the leaders of Dalian PetroChina. A large banner with grammatically incorrect Chinese welcomed them to the “fire rescue live event.”

See more images from the Dalian oil spill
--Aurthur
The spill in Dalian is yet another reminder that oil is a dirty business, and the only way to stop future spills is to leave the oil in the ground. Enough is enough. Sign our petition to Congress telling them that now is the time for a permanent ban on ALL new drilling.
The Gulf is now one massive experiment
I'm back home now after nearly two weeks of working as a boat driver for Greenpeace in the Gulf. This was my second time in the Gulf to help with work related to the BP Deep
water Horizon disaster. What I experienced this time was entirely different from my first trip last
month.
Last month, I saw deeply-oiled marshes and mangroves. There were lots of oiled birds; entire nests were slathered in oil. I witnessed hundreds of dolphins swimming in oil-slicked waters. Now this time, a little over a month later, the oil slicks are nearly gone! In traveling the Gulf from Louisiana to Alabama, I hardly saw an oil slick at all. All I saw was an ever-present light sheen in the water. What happened?
BP has poured about two million gallons of Corexit oil dispersant into the Gulf. Obviously the stuff works, because it's hard to see the oil visually any more. As a result, the Gulf states are reopening their beaches and recreational fishing, and the pressure is on to reopen
commercial fishing.
The thing is, the water is now toxic. Here's a clip from a local news station showing the amount of oil that's in the water as a result of Corexit:
The effect of using Corexit is that the oil doesn't float on the surface of the water now. Instead, it's dissolved into the water. This means it can't be skimmed, and also that it flows with the water current in addition to the wind. The oil is now spreading around the Gulf in such a way that it can't be collected. In addition to all that, Corexit has never before been used in any quantity approaching this level. The Gulf is now one massive experiment.
It was particularly disturbing to me to see children playing in the water while oil clean-up crews were on the same beach a few hundred feet away, collecting tar balls. It's hard to watch because the water looks safe, but isn't.
Because of all this, how we witness this tragedy has now changed. Instead of seeing oiled shorelines, we'll now see the effects through water sample testing. It's a more difficult message to convey, because things are starting to *appear* okay. To the contrary, the disaster is
only beginning. We'll be living with a fundamentally-changed Gulf ecosystem for decades to come.
Let's work together to create a better future for our children by supporting an Energy Revolution!
Greenpeace activists shut down BP gas stations all over London
This morning, starting at 5.30am, teams of Greenpeace volunteers shut down 50 BP stations across London.
The teams - each named after an animal threatened by BP's reckless oil exploration - fanned out across the capital in their electric and hybrid cars, going station to station and disabling the pumps.
Why today? Because BP is expected to announce later the appointment of Bob Dudley as the company's new head to replace the gaffe-prone Tony Hayward, who led BP during the disastrous Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

Check out the live updates from the activists over the the Greenpeace UK site.
We want to send a strong message to BP's new boss to ditch the spin and actually move 'beyond petroleum'.But there's more. This is also about realizing what we can achieve if we set our minds to it.
We can end the oil age. We already have the tools we need to leave it behind and move towards a clean energy future. All that's missing is the determination to make it happen fast.
Tell Congress: No new drilling, period!

ABOVE: The safety switches from the BP Stations in London that were shutdown today by Greenpeace volunteers. These were removed, operating the safety shutdown and and closing the pumps. We're going to return all the switches later but until they fit new ones at the stations, the pumps will be out of action.
This blog post comes from Lisa Vickers, a webbie at Greenpeace International.
Bull's-Eye in Your Backyard: Chemical Plant Security 2010
Friends at Greenpeace asked me to visit Washington this week to meet with some key Senators who will be voting soon on chemical plant security.
While admittedly only one on a list of many potential terrorist targets across this country, chemical plants must be given greater attention since from a terrorist's perspective chemical plants offer a maximum kill rate for a minimal effort. Studies have shown that just one chemical facility can place up to a million people at risk.
The facts illustrate that virtually every major populated area has one or more of the 5,000 most lethal, "high-risk"chemical facilities. Sadly, many of these facilities suffer from lax oversight, poor perimeter security, and vulnerable operating technologies.
Such facilities are open to: aerial attack (a terrorist flying a small, private plane into the facility); cyber-attack (a terrorist logging in and overtaking an operating system from a net café half way around the world); internal attack (a disgruntled employee deciding to push a button); and/or mere human error (BP's Deep Horizon oil spill proves that catastrophic accidents can and do happen).

Short of handing out HAZMAT suits and masks to every individual living within the zone of danger, there are other feasible ways to make such lethal facilities safer. One simple way is to use smart security. Smart security essentially means substituting the lethal variety of a chemical with a non-lethal alternative so that if an accidental release occurs nobody dies. Here is a list of 500+ success stories.
Admittedly, using such alternatives will initially create a nominal cost increase to the chemical company but perhaps, more importantly, smart security means no dead people for the surrounding community. Seems like a no-brainer, right?
Nope, it's not because for some in Washington it remains business as usual.
Read more at Huffington Post >>
Kristen Breitweiser, 9/11 widow and activist, is known for pressuring official Washington to provide a public accounting to the American people of what went wrong on the morning of September 11 and in the months leading up to the disaster that claimed the life of her husband and more than 3000 others.
Will hurricanes rain down oil on the Gulf of Mexico?
By the end of the summer, it could be raining oil along the Gulf of Mexico.
Hurricane Alex is the first of a series of 14 named storms predicted for the 2010 hurricane season. The Gulf is warmer than it's been since before 2005 when unusually warm water super-charged Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and also led to massive coral bleaching and die-offs across the Caribbean. Even as it makes landfall 600 miles from the main oil slicks, the waves and winds generated by Alex have forced skimming operations to be cancelled and threatened to push oil farther onto the shores and into the marshes that include 40 percent of America's coastal wetlands.
During this potentially devastating storm season of 2010, the Gulf's massive fields of oil could be swept ashore, mixed in the water column, or even lifted into the storm clouds to rain out in oily downpours, like some Biblical plague, on the coastal communities of the oil-producing Gulf.
In 2005, just after Hurricane Katrina, I remember stopping in Biloxi, Miss., by an 8,000-ton, 600-foot-long casino barge that the 25-to-30-foot storm surge had driven half a mile across Beach Drive. Somewhere underneath its barnacle-encrusted black hull was a historic mansion. Another casino barge had gouged a hole halfway up the stately six-story yellow brick yacht club before coming to rest next to it. The beach was covered for miles in plastic buckets, insulation, mattresses, furniture, chunks of drywall, and Styrofoam pellets that the seabirds were eyeing as potential snack food. I felt like an eco-geek being more concerned about the gulls and wetlands than the lost revenue from the casinos that everyone else seemed to be obsessing about.
On June 28, 2010, tar balls started coming ashore on Biloxi's cleaned-up white sand beaches just as they had been on the squeaky sugar-white sands of the Florida Panhandle for days and weeks. Far less dramatic than what I'd seen after Katrina, these are the first signs of what promises to be a far more persistent and continuous fouling of beaches for months and possibly years to come. With 95 percent of the oil still offshore, these first small tar balls represent a dire threat to the economic drivers of the Gulf states that are its coastlines, particularly for the state of Florida, where they could be scraping oil off the sand till there's no sand left.
Even after the most visible oil is cleaned up by a living wave of work crews and skimmers, much of it remains behind, infiltrating into the backwater wetlands or the sand itself.
In Grand Isle, La., Greenpeace marine biologist (and Ocean Campaign Director) John Hocevar takes me out on Greenpeace's 27-foot diesel jet-powered rigid hull inflatable, the Billy Greene, named for a filmmaker who loved the natural world but was cut down by an urban predator. 
We zip across to Grand Terre Island, which had been hit by oil two days earlier. The water on the crossing is full of pods of dolphin workboats and oily rainbow sheens. Just as New Orleans after Katrina looked like a Woodstock for first responders, the waters around Grand Isle now look like a boat show for oil-spill response vessels.
The beach on Grand Terre is boomed off and relatively cleaned off, though there's still some heavy oil left between a rock jetty and the marsh behind it. I stumble and climb on the side of the boulder-pile break wall to where the oil is thick and brown on the rocks and along the marsh grass. The tidal swell between the rocks slowly lifts and lowers the thick sludgy oil, reminding me of a brown diseased lung rising and falling in an open chest. It seems like a living thing and keeps me mesmerized for some minutes till I get a call from a CNN producer asking if I think the Coast Guard has the resources to meet this latest disaster. The media presence is heavy as the humidity on these bayous and hopefully won't go away once the exploding oil bore is sealed. 
On our way off the beach, there are two dolphins swimming by some yellow blackened oily boom. "Some oil became pebble-like interacting with the sand," Hocevar tells me. More oil appears as red spots on the surface of the sand, though he says it has also sunk below the surface. I take a stick to dig with and see more copper-like spots appear along the edges of the hole I've created. After confirming what he's said, I throw the sandy stick away and brush my hands against each other, only the sand won't come off. I try again. When I rub my hands on my jeans, they leave an oily brown stain on the denim and thin brown streaks of oil on my palms. Now multiply that one million times or more and add wind fetch and storm surges.
I seriously doubt that we can "make it better than it was before," as President Obama promised he would do for the Gulf region in his recent White House speech on the disaster. BP also makes promises in radio ads that play every day around here: "We may not always be perfect but we will make it right." I love the calculated tone of the ad. Hell, we all know nobody is perfect. I may have killed my grandma and shot my dog, but I'll make it right.
Meanwhile, we continue to hope for more luck than we're likely to get during this hurricane season.
This post also appeared on Grist.org.
Proposed forest law threatens Amazon rainforest
In Brazil, moves are afoot to amend a piece of legislation that has been protecting the Amazon rainforest for over 70 years, and not for the better. If the changes are voted through, it could mean that the area of the Amazon which can be legally destroyed will double, and it's the backers of these changes — the agriculture, biofuels and energy barons — who stand to benefit as they argue that pesky forest laws are a hindrance to economic development.
Believe it or not, Brazil's forest code is a wonderfully progressive piece of legislation, in theory protecting huge areas of rainforest (whereas in practice, the problems of policing such a vast area and associated corruption means that there's plenty of illegal logging going on).
It's been around in one form or another since 1934, and was significantly improved by the previous president, Fernando Henrique Cardoso. The deforestation rates in 1995 were so abominably high that the following year, he amended the code to increase what's known as the legal reserve — the amount of forest on a farm or settlement which must be protected — from 50 to 80 per cent.
Over the last 10 years, there have been over 30 attempts to undermine the code (here's a previous effort we reported on), all of which have failed to make any significant changes. But now another effort is underway to roll back the legal reserve to 50 percent, spearheaded by Aldo Rebelo, a politician who is painting the concept of forest protection as a conspiracy by the developed world to restrict Brazilian development. This chimes nicely with the demands of the big agribusiness corporations who want to expand further into what they see as land with undeveloped potential.
Lots of other insidious alterations are currently being discussed, including an amnesty on anyone guilty of illegal logging before July 2008. But it's the 50 percent marker which will do the most damage if it gets through.
Our researchers, together with IPAM (the Amazon Environmental Research Institute), estimate that the area of rainforest which can be legally cleared could double, so around 85 million hectares (over 210 million acres) could vanish. Imagine England and France squished together — that's how big 85m hectares is, and given that only (only — ha!) 73m hectares (over 180m acres) have been lost to date, that's a hell of a lot.
So what's happening? The Brazilian congress will vote on the package of changes this week and, although there are several more political hoops to jump through before it becomes law, if the Brazilian congress votes in favor of the changes, the weakened forest code will be one step further to being approved.
It's also an election year in Brazil and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva will be stepping down as president. During his term of office over the last seven years, deforestation in the Amazon has plummeted, and Lula has made commitments to further reduce deforestation as well as slash Brazil's greenhouse gas emissions. If the amendments go through, both of these ambitions will be in tatters, not to mention Lula's legacy, and the impacts on the health of our planet will be devastating.
What may look like a national issue is one of global importance — the influence the Amazon rainforest has on climate and water cycles stretch far beyond its official boundaries, and the greenhouse gas emissions which will be the true bounty from further deforestation will affect us all.
We're not asking your help at the moment, but if it looks like the new forest code is getting closer to becoming law then we may well ask you to take action to save the Amazon rainforest.
About Me
greenpeace_guest_blogger
San Francisco, CA USA
Greenpeace campaigners, independent scientists, and issue experts from around the world frequently blog for us as guest bloggers, and will be posted to this account. Enjoy!
Your Personal Activist Network
Archives
July 2010 (6)
June 2010 (3)
May 2010 (5)
April 2010 (2)
March 2010 (1)
February 2010 (3)
January 2010 (1)
December 2009 (1)
November 2009 (5)
October 2009 (1)
September 2009 (6)
July 2009 (3)
- more...



