A black eye for Emma and another step forward for bluefin tuna

| More
jhocevar

Today things got ugly.  

We are in Valletta Harbor in Malta.  We learned that there were two vessels here owned by Fuentes, the tuna tycoon who controls over half the bluefin catch in the Mediterranean.  We decided to board the vessel to inspect the cargo and documentation.  Three women, Emma, Rita, and Liz, were the first to volunteer.

After the vessels refused our polite request to allow us access, Emma stepped on board to press the point. She was immediately attacked – they punched her, pulled her hair, picked her up and threw her overboard.  One person hurled a large wooden pallet which whistled by our heads, and another tossed a full bucket of paint into one of our boats.  If either of those had hit their intended targets, someone could have been seriously injured, but fortunately no damage was done.

Greenpeace is not known for taking no for an answer.  For us, the violent response to a simple request to inspect the vessel reinforced our belief that they had something to hide.  And even if they did not, greater transparency is essential to ensure that vessels are not able to obscure the kinds of illegal activity which have contributed to the bluefin’s decline.

We climbed onto the pier, where Emma again tried to board one of the Fuentes vessels.  She was viciously assaulted by a burly sailor twice her size, holding her down and punching her repeatedly in the face.  (We brought her to a clinic here for treatment, and she has a black eye and her neck is swollen but she’s ok.)

We refused to leave the pier, which is private property, until the two vessels were inspected.  The police came, and boarded the two vessels.  They reported to us that they did not see tuna on board, and that Malta fisheries inspectors were on the way.  Then we were taken to the police station, where statements were taken but no charges were filed against us.  Whether or not the fishermen will be charged with assault remains to be seen.

Unfortunately, corruption is widespread in the Maltese Fisheries Conservation and Control Division.  After several calls, they finally blurted “will you stop calling please; we’ve been instructed not to talk to Greenpeace.  If you want to pursue this further, I suggest you take this up with the Fisheries Minister.”  Calls to the Fisheries Minister went unanswered, but we will take this up with him in detail later.

There is a lot at stake here, especially for bluefin tuna, which are being mismanaged out of existence.  But also for fishermen – including many of the ones we spoke to last week, which are no longer able to make a living except by towing fish caught by much bigger, more expensive boats.

We were happy to see a French warship out on the high seas, inspecting tuna vessels.  The Mediterranean is too big for inspectors to cover every boat, however, and illegal activity continues.  And unfortunately, even the legal catch is far too much for the population to sustain.  

Last year, we overheard one tuna vessel owner complaining that it was not fair that Greenpeace activists were often women, as it’s awkward to beat them up.  Apparently, times have changed – these thugs did not hesitate.  Of course, their violent attack has already backfired, turning what could have been a simple (and frankly not very interesting) inspection into an international incident.  Footage of the attack has already traveled widely, and the story – and the fight to save bluefin tuna - continues to gather momentum. &nbsp

Comments:

Permalink Ron J McGill [Visitor] on June 22, 2009 at 15:32
You should sue those bastards for assault.

Permalink rational [Member] on June 22, 2009 at 17:27
You should not attempt forceful trespassing, especially with GIRLS. What a bunch of gutless whiners you are! Greenpeace has no authority to board, or to do jack! (other than wave your little banners) Boarding that boat without permission is no different than breaking into any other private property… YOU guys are the one’s who should be sued…
Permalink Matt [Visitor] on June 22, 2009 at 18:09
As an outside observer who was there, my perspective is this: Greenpeace absolutely has the authority as an NGO committed to conservation to insist on transparency from any ship engaged in the harvesting or trade of bluefin tuna. Here's why: for the past handful of years, the scientists charged with making recommendations to the commission responsible for managing the bluefin tuna have recommended that the quota be set at a certain level. In 2007, this was 15,000 metric tonnes. So what does the governing body do but set the quota at twice that. And what do the fishermen do but harvest twice that number? In short, the scientists recommended 15,000 MT max, the commission set the quota at 30,000 MT, and the fishermen harvested 61,000 MT. Much of that was through illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing. There are tons of ways to "launder" tuna. One way is to hide behind the lack of transparency in this business. So, Greenpeace insists that vessels be transparent with the role they're playing in the trade of these fish. Governments have failed miserably to hold the industries profiting from this trade accountable. Greenpeace is actually doing something about the so-called "legalized" extinction of a species for profit. The group is made up of people who have devoted themselves, regardless of whether they are male or female, to confronting this. Don't you get it? The politicians and industry owners have the connections to make the laws, set the quotas, etc. By the way, I was there when volunteers were called for. The women had their hands up immediately and before anyone else did. Why shouldn't they participate equally?
Permalink mikeg [Member] on June 22, 2009 at 18:12
"rational," your comment is completely off-base. surely you can agree that someone breaking into someone else's home, for instance, would quite likely have much different motives than someone putting their life on the line to stop illegal activity that is imperiling the well-being of an entire ecosystem.

it actually takes a lot of guts to willingly put yourself in such a situation. i for one admire Emma's obvious courage in attempting to board that ship even though several of the ship's crew were waiting for her and were obviously more than willing to use violence to hide their illegal activities.

i would also point out that it takes absolutely no guts, or even more than half a brain, to sit at your computer writing knee-jerk diatribes on our every post. (to say nothing of the childish name-calling you engage in...)
Permalink bluesky9 [Visitor] on June 22, 2009 at 18:26
Wow! Seeing grown men punching GIRLS is gutless. Harvesting Bluefin tuna to the point of extinction is gutless and ignorant. Greenpeace has been supporting and fighting for our environment for years and how exactly does that translate into "gutless whiners"?

I am thankful that Greenpeace continues to stay strong in the face of opposition.
Permalink md [Member] on June 22, 2009 at 20:31
John,
I have all the respect for what you, Emma, Rita, and Liz did today - Congratulations and have a great trip with many victories for now and the future. We support you and your effort.
Permalink patriot44 [Member] on June 22, 2009 at 22:44
For RATIONAL,
Greenpeace does have the right Bluefin just may be a fish but, it is a life. I'd like them to stay around for a while.
I'm glad Greenpeace took some Action. I thought you guys were getting soft for a while.
P
Permalink patriot44 [Member] on June 22, 2009 at 22:46
I just wish she would have punched back.
P
Permalink SaveTheBluefin [Visitor] on June 22, 2009 at 23:14
Dear Emma:
From all of us here on http://www.SaveTheBluefin.com we salute you and pledge to carry on the simple mission for which you fight - to inceasing awareness about the rampant problems facing the bluefin tuna. Your bruises go saluted here in the the USA and serve as energy packs for the rest of us to confront establishment and challenge broken thinking. When the bluefin emerges victorious, you will have a solidified stake in the new order. Feel better!
Permalink randyfisher07 [Visitor] on June 23, 2009 at 02:31
jhocevar
"it actually takes a lot of guts to willingly put yourself in such a situation. i for one admire Emma's obvious courage in attempting to board that ship even though several of the ship's crew were waiting for her and were obviously more than willing to use violence to hide their illegal activities."
http://www.amazonthunder.com
Permalink vorpalchick [Visitor] on June 23, 2009 at 03:46
While your intentions to conserve the Mediterranean tuna stocks are very noble indeed, you do have to realize that boarding a vessel without authorization is tantamount to piracy.

Greenpeace activists had no right to board those boats - I don't know the Maltese laws, but it is quite possible that even the police would need some kind of warrant to do so. You can't just take the laws into your hands! If you do so, you deserve what you get - not least a loss of respect from many of your law-abiding supporters.
Permalink rational [Member] on June 23, 2009 at 05:49
Using your logic, Tiller's assassin had the "right" to do what he did. Authority is a legal condition that is granted not assumed. The law doesn’t give a damn about the motive of the guy breaking into my house... and I don’t either.

Excuse me for being rational, but I think you guys are simply out of touch with reality. (You got your cool video though!)
Permalink satyanh [Visitor] on June 23, 2009 at 08:42
Wow. What an inspiring video. I hope that Emma and the rest of the crew continue to be courageous in the face of hostility and outright violence. Her action is an important step to bear witness to the ecological atrocity that is the bluefin tuna hunt.
While some disagree with the tactic of illegally boarding a ship to expose such a problem (see vorpalchick's comment or rational's idiocy), I for one stand in solidarity with your actions and those of other activists around the world. It is neither radical nor out of line for people put their bodies in the way of injustice. Rather, the continued plundering of our planet by corporations with tacit support by mindless drones (see rational) is absolutely radical.
Permalink pribilof [Member] on June 23, 2009 at 11:10
I work with the folks doing this corageous work, but here in Alaska, and I am proud of it.

Far too often governments believe they own the resources of the earth. It is we who own, if you will, and are responsible for their care. We damage their habitat and destroy their chances of survival, and so must be accountable.

All businesses who use these resources must be transparent, else how are we to know what they are doing? At least in America we have a bit of that, but sadly and quickly even that bit is being whittled down.

Good Job Taiyox....please convey my congrats and best wishes to your crew.
Permalink paul [Visitor] on June 23, 2009 at 12:00
Of course they were treated like criminals. They came aboard uninvited to grind some sort of political ax and were treated like malicious geeks looking for publicity.

Imagine for a moment if someone came into your home to "inspect" your refrigerator or the contents of your closet. You'd want whoever tried this to be legally entitled to do so wouldn't you?

Heros? Naw,..not hardly, if you want to be hero why not go to a third world country and really help someone who's starving.
Permalink ron [Visitor] on June 23, 2009 at 14:02
They were stopping violent people from performing their violent (and ILLEGAL) acts. If the police won't police them, someone has to, and THAT, Mr "Rational" is what they are doing.

Power to the people (and the animals)!
Permalink rational [Member] on June 23, 2009 at 14:31
Subsequent inspections by sanctioned authorities revealed no illegal harvest. The fact that the legal harvest was more than Greenpeace liked is irrelevant.

Greenpeace is only interested in publishing their videos and their banners, and THAT, Mr. Ron is what they are doing...
Permalink savee419 [Member] on June 23, 2009 at 15:30
Greenpeace is interested in more than publicity, but if it take publicity to get proper protections for the environment in place, then that is what it takes.

Change does not come quietly.
Permalink greenarrow9 [Member] on June 23, 2009 at 18:38
Emma, you are tough as nails, thank you so very much for taking this non-violent action. Your bravery and determination is a testament and I feel re-energized to do whatever I can to stand with you on behalf of standards of responsible management of our precious seas. The oceans of the world are intimately linked to the health of the humans on board planet earth. On behalf of my children and grandchildren, please accept my sincere thanks for your sacrifice. We GET IT!

http://members.greenpeace.org/gpblog/?blog=24557
Permalink Burly9 [Visitor] on June 24, 2009 at 06:05
I'm sorry but force to attempt to inspect a ship is no different than ramming one at sea. I do believe in what your trying to accomplish, but not with any type of physical/forced action. At 66 years old with a varied background the one thing I have learned is that forcing an issue does not work.
Permalink chancequirk [Member] on June 26, 2009 at 03:56
EMMA RITA LIZ I LOVE YOU LADIES THANK YOU I WISH YOU ALL GREAT THINGS AND PLEASE NEVER LET ANYTHING STOP YOU FROM DOING WHAT YOU DO NOTHING. YOU ARE BRAVE GREAT STRONG PERSISTANT SWEET UNDERSTANDING PEACEFUL I CAN SAY PROBABLY COUNTLESS GREAT THINGS YOU LADIES POSSES DOING WHAT YOU DO AND THIS WORLD NEEDS YOU LADIES ME AND ALL GREENPEACE FOR SURVIVAL AND THIS WORLD NEEDS THIS WORLD SEEING WHAT IS HAPPENING AND GREENPEACE IS THE REASON WHY THIS WORLD IS STILL IN A SAVING POSITION THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU PEACE PEACE PEACE PEACE PEACE PEACE PEACE PEACE PEACE
Permalink chancequirk [Member] on June 26, 2009 at 04:27
RATIONAL YOU ARE NOT A MEMBER WITH THE REASON YOU DO NOT SUPPORT GREENPEACE BELIEFS AND ACTIONS AND I WAS READING ALL YOUR LATEST COMMENTS AND YES YOU DO ALLWAYS HAVE A COMMENT AGAINST US YOU SHOULD BE REMOVED AS A MEMBER AND ONLY ALLOWED AS A VISITOR YOU DO NOT THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU SAY. MANY THINGS YOU SAY ARE EXPLAINED TO YOU FOR YOU BY REAL MEMBERS. REAL MEMBERS DO NOT NEED TO SAY REAL MEMBERS THEY PROVE IT WITH WHAT THEY SAY AND WITH WHAT THEY DO. YOU ONLY DO NOT AGREE AND YOU SAY BAD AND STUPID THINGS AND THAT MAKES YOU NOT A GREENPEACE ACTIVIST AND THAT MEANS YOU ARE NOT A MEMBER. I HOPE FOR YOUR TIME, EFFORTS AND FINGERS YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT I TYPED THANK YOU FOR YOUR THOUGHTS GREENPEACE LOVES DIFFERENT PEOPLE DIFFERENT CULTURES AND BACKGROUNDS AND REMEMBER A PERSON WHO DOES NOT AGREE WITH GREENPEACE ACTIONS METHODS BELIEFS AND CONCERNS IS A PERSON WHO IS NOT A MEMBER. THE PERSON IS ONLY A PERSON WHO IS WELLCOME FOR SPEAKING HER OR HIS THOUGHTS AND NEEDS TO TYPE VISITOR "NOT" " "MEMBER" THANK YOU PEACE PEACE PEACE
Permalink chancequirk [Member] on June 26, 2009 at 04:38
GREENPEACE I LOVE YOU GREAT PEACE GREAT WISHES GREAT LUCK WE WILL NEVER STOP YOU GALS AND GUYS ARE THE BEST OF THE BEST OF THE BEST AND I AM SPEECHLESS NOW WITH THE REASON THERE IS NO WORDS THAT ARE ABLE TO DESCRIBE HOW GREAT I FEEL ABOUT GREENPEACE THANK YOU MY FRIENDS FOREVER GREENPEACE GREENPEACE GREENPEACE

You must have an account and be logged in to post comments. Log in or create an account for the Greenpeace member center here.

Sign up

The planet needs you, and so do we. Join our mailing list to get the latest Greenpeace news, online action alerts, and more delivered to your inbox. It's one more way you can help create a more green and peaceful future.

Activist blog

Join the conversation on the Greenpeace Activist blog! Start your own blog and connect with other bloggers. Network with fellow activists, share your stories, discuss latest news and trends and trade tips on organizing and living green. The Greenpeace Activist blog is your place to help build and engage with the environmental movement.

Syndicate

RSS  Full RSS Feed

Search

Latest video

Recent Staff Bloggers




702 H Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 462-1177
youtube   myspace   facebook