BLOGS 
SUPPORT GREENPEACE   GET A BLOG | SIGN IN >   NEIGHBOR BLOG >     
Mocking Americans

05/21/08

Permalink 15:18:51
Mocking Americans
A clear window into what happened to our democracy could be seen today as the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing, “Exploring the Skyrocketing Price of Oil,” with executives from BP, Shell, Chevron, Conoco Phillips and ExxonMobil.  I found it on C-Span.  Some of the highlights:

None of the executives could remember how much they make, although most admitted it was in excess on 2 million dollars.  They all did their best to look somber about the record high prices of oil and then went on to blame China, OPEC (remember that old boogeyman?) and most importantly, lack of access to new places to drill for oil to help make America energy independent.  These guys are paid enormous amounts of money to pretend they care about the pain the public feels when they tighten the screws on us.  Congress throws some theatrically tough questions and act concerned, although they don’t pay for the gas for their own limos.  You and I do.  So its sort of like Broadway except it seems the makeup artists use brooms.    

J. Stephen Simon, the Senior VP of ExxonMobil went through a series of arguments showing how dramatically the oil industry margins have been reduced.  By the end of his explanation it seemed that ExxonMobil was profitless, although thanks to public records we know that their profits were a record 40 billion dollars last year and are on pace to crush that record this year.  He spoke of working together to strengthen American competitiveness, advised us not to worry about the current “upcycle” (that was his euphemism for the sky high gasoline prices) and all the while whining about taxes.

All the executives stated directly or implied that the oil price crisis could be alleviated by giving them access to the last wild places where oil is still to be found in America: the Rocky Mountain Front Range, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and more coastal drilling.  If your grandmother had oil in her teeth they’d want those too.  The fact is that these sources take years to explore, destroy wild areas permanently and would only reduce the price of oil marginally.  But they would add handsomely to the oil companies’ profits.  It’s the perfect argument for the oil companies: they want more of the same, record profits, easy access to our lands and waters, continued subsidies of about 40 billion dollars a year for oil and gas (easy to remember as it is the same as ExxonMobil’s 2007 profits – and both are on track to go up in 2008), and blame the lack of access on the environmentalists.   

The fact is I am not against oil prices going up.  That is what is going to make us use less.  If oil prices were being driven up by a federal system that put a cap on the carbon that these and other companies bring into the economy and force them to buy credits to emit permitted amounts, the revenue from the credits would then go back to Americans, all Americans to help offset the higher energy costs – not drive profits higher.

The retiring head of Shell had a fun way to try and downplay the record profits.  He mumbled out something about the profits they are reporting being very large in absolute numbers but you have to look at the segments of our business, the upstream something or another, historic age of oilfields, marginal costs… 

I started to feel sorry for these guys, I felt less resentful of the 40 billion dollars in subsidies that we give these guys each year who can’t remember how many millions of dollars they are paid.  Heck, I felt like running down to the Hill and bringing them flowers.  After all, they got some pretty tough questions from the Senators.  To make matters worse, a protest kicked in, I could hear the voices in the back of the room while watching on my computer screen the faces of the witnesses as they heard somebody demanding that we separate oil and state  Dammed hippies insisting that the politicians stop taking campaign donations from the executives that they are supposed to protect Americans from, yeah, and wreck the whole game.

Pretty nuts… like enough to make you wanna take the bus.

 

 

Comments:

Comment from: jon_k [Visitor]
Hello, John.
The 40B oil industry subsidy. Source? Anything newer than the 1998 Koplow-Martin report?
Permalink 2008-06-28 @ 11:03
Comment from: scottray [Member] · /blog/scottray
The whole point of a business is to make a profit. The govt. isn't a business and it made 160 billion from gas. Also the 40 billion the oil companies made was before they paid their employees and then the employees paid their taxes so the govt. made more money. Nobody complains about any other business makes a profit. More drilling and refining would cut prices and wouldn't destroy the land. You wouldn't be able to tell they were even there when they were done because of the technology available today.
Permalink 2008-07-11 @ 17:03
Comment from: dfiske80 [Member] · /blog/dfiske80
Hello Sir,
How are you doing? I volunteer for Greenpeace, Boston and I'm interested in your in put on something I've been working on, for nearly a decade. I think it would be great for Greenpeace, Boston to do fundraising other then canvassing. I'm no good at canvassing, but I enjoy fundraising and working with Greenpeace, Boston. I've come up with a "small business" fundraiser that I believe would be beneficial to Greenpeace Members, the establishment we hold the event at, and Greenpeace itself. I want to fundraise with Greenpeace, but as I said, I'm horrible at sales. I've been working alongside Greenpeace, Boston since 1996 (my sophomore year of high school), and I would like to improve the relationship between Greenpeace staff its members. Furthermore, I would like to have a forum where members can come and listen (face-to-face) about 'Greenpeace, Boston News', be informed what project Greenpeace, Boston is working on and have an opportunity to ask questions or voice concerns. Also, I would like to set up a social event where fellow Greenpeace, Boston members could socialize and get to know eachother.

Could you please look at my proposal I posted in the 'Discussions' section, under 'What are the issues you're working on in your community?" and my proposal is titled "Mobilizing Greenpeace, Boston Members"

Any input and ideas would be greatly appreciated. I went to high school in Boston and I've had first hand experience with Greenpeace, Boston since 1996, in my personal oppinion, I would love to see a 'monthly-members' meeting. Where members attend for free, friends and family could come for a contribution of $10 and non-Greenpeace individuals with no friends or family in Greenpeace could attend for a cover charge/donation of $25. I think I have a real strong idea for a consistant monthly fundraiser for Greenpeace. I've been working on this idea since the late 90's, please help. Best of luck with all your work and thank you for standing up for so much environmental injustices. Let me know what I can do for you.
peace,
Daren Fiske
dfiske80@yahoo.com
781.648.1271
Permalink 2008-07-12 @ 19:47
Comment from: jon_k [Visitor]
Sorry. I misread and thought John was referring to oil industry subsidies, not profit.

I'm trying to track down the subsidies we pay to the oil industries. Estimates range from nothing to $250B/year with a 1998 study on the Greenpeace website in between at something like $35B. I'm hoping that someone reading this can point to some studies newer than 1998, something better than someone quoting someone who heard it somewhere.
Permalink 2008-07-13 @ 11:54

You must have an account and be logged in to post comments. Log in or create an account for the Greenpeace member center here.

About Me

john_passacantando
Alexandria, VA USA



Contact Me >

Invite john_passacantando to your Personal Activist Network

Syndicate XML

Categories

Report a Problem | Sign up to newsletter