Arctic meltdown should be an urgent wake-up call

| More
melanie_d After spending more than five weeks at the Petermann Glacier, the Arctic Sunrise began its transit down the west coast of Greenland at around midnight Wednesday night. Our primary goal at Petermann Glacier was to document the calving of the glacier — an ice island about 100km2 is expected to fall into the sea any day now — with remote time-lapse cameras perched on 1000 m cliffs overlooking the glacier. Even though the ice island has not yet calved, our time-lapse cameras remain in place, ready to document the glacier's disintegration should it happen this summer.

Greenpeace image: Arctic Sunrise at Robeson ice bridge
The Arctic Sunrise reaches 'the ice bridge' in the Robeson channel, at 82.4 North, near the border between Greenland and Canada. This is the Southernmost extent of the summer sea ice which usually extends much further south into the Nares Strait, but has receded dramatically in recent years. © Greenpeace/Nick Cobbing

People have been asking if I’m disappointed that Petermann Glacier did not calve a large ice island while we were there. My honest answer is no.

From the early stages when we first started planning this expedition, I was keenly aware that ice conditions in Nares Strait meant that the ship had only a 50/50 chance of reaching Petermann Glacier in the first place. In reality, our passage north was virtually clear of sea ice – we sailed right to the top of the strait, reaching the ice bridge that is holding back the Arctic Ocean’s thick, multi-year sea ice on June 29th, just 445 nautical miles from the North Pole. The fact that we actually reached Petermann Glacier at all, and then had more than five weeks to conduct research into the dynamics that influence its (and nearby Humboldt Glacier’s) sensitivity to global warming, was truly an unexpected bonus. Together, Petermann and Humboldt glaciers drain a full ten percent of the ice that flows from the immense Greenland Ice Sheet into the sea, with serious implications for sea level rise the world over.

The independent science team on board the ship gathered a lot of important data in a part of the world that is remote and challenging to reach. With the support of the Arctic Sunrise and her crew, the scientists were able to conduct glacier and oceanographic studies that will help fill the gaps in their own and the greater scientific community’s understanding of how Greenland’s glaciers and the ice sheet react to global warming. In the last seven years, the Greenland Ice Sheet's contribution to sea level rise more than doubled, due to a surprisingly rapid and unpredicted loss of ice. There is still so much that scientists do not understand about how Greenland’s glaciers and ice sheet are reacting to global warming. It’s a stunning example of how the impacts of global warming on the ground are outpacing scientific models, which is the case throughout the Arctic and in much of the world.

Greenpeace image: Scientists in the Arctic
The 'whirlpool' and crack on the Petermann glacier. Geophysicist Dr Richard Bates, of the Scottish Oceans Institute at the University of St. Andrews, takes 'casts' of temperature pressure current and salinity. © Greenpeace/Nick Cobbing

Ironically, while the Arctic Sunrise was conducting research on glaciers in northwest Greenland, the Waxman-Markey bill was being further weakened by Congress and fossil fuel industry lobbyists whose goal is to protect business as usual at the expense of protecting the climate. The bill reflects a huge gap between what US lawmakers are willing to do and what climate science is saying the planet needs. It’s clear that no one in the US government, including President Obama himself, is prepared to do what’s necessary to prevent climate catastrophe.

Any bill that does not include science-based targets of at least 40 percent reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 falls far short of what is needed. Even emissions reductions of 20 or 30 percent by 2020 won’t cut it; it’s just not possible to save the climate a little bit at a time. Obama and Congress can’t shut their eyes and hope this issue will somehow go away. It won’t. In coming years and decades we will all wonder what the heck they were thinking when they failed to address the problem with meaningful action.

I know it’s naïve, but I wish President Obama could spend just one day with us on board this ship, talking with the independent scientists on board about how climate change is affecting Greenland’s glaciers and ice sheet, and in turn, what it means for the US and the rest of the planet. He would leave the ship understanding that anything less than science-based targets in US and global climate policy condemns the world to the worst impacts of climate change, which, by the way, will ravage the economy and health care system in incalculable ways. The economic problems caused by sub-prime mortgages, irresponsible lending and bank failures will seem like child’s play compared with what continued and unabated global warming will cause.

The Arctic Sunrise is now heading south toward the next stages of this expedition. Independent science teams will be joining us to conduct research on Greenland’s east coast glaciers as well as sea ice. We will continue our work here in Greenland, using every tactic we can to amplify the voices of scientists who are on the cutting edge of global warming research. Our hope is that both their work and voices will form part of the impetus for Congress and President Obama to take real action on global warming in the four months that remain before the Copenhagen climate talks in December.

Comments:

Permalink cheemzy [Visitor] on August 08, 2009 at 21:31
i kinda agree with u... this climate change thing should become special interest for obama ...
Permalink Gilbert [Visitor] on August 09, 2009 at 00:43
It's one of the impacts of global warming that we have now. All of us must help in saving our mother earth for the future of next generations. We need to work hard for the going green campaigns all around the world!
Permalink rotem [Visitor] on August 09, 2009 at 11:57
The global warming issue must become to be on the desk of any prime minister around the world.
Permalink bob ongpin [Visitor] on August 09, 2009 at 23:58
it is indeed very alarming. we are now experiencing the impacts of global warming.
Permalink Debra [Visitor] on August 17, 2009 at 09:15
The largest cause of environmental damage on this Earth can be eliminated without any action by politicians - it is in our hands. The industry that is the second largest source of greenhouse gases (greater than all forms of transportation combined) also uses 70% of our water, is the main cause of dead zones in our oceans, and pollutes our rivers. it is the meat industry. Reducing or eliminating meat consumption is the easiest and quickest way to stop global warming.

If you aren't a vegetarian, you can't call yourself an environmentalist.
Permalink tree hugger [Visitor] on August 17, 2009 at 12:23
Based on what ive read the global tempeture has only risen 1 deg. over the last one hundred years. This year a few midwest states had their coldest winters ever. How could we have global warming based on those facts?
Permalink tree hugger [Visitor] on August 17, 2009 at 12:32
Prezbo is trying to ravage the econemy and health care system right now! The scientists cant stop scare me "global warming" from happening. What we all need to do is just eat rice and ride bicycles every where. Then we could get rid of the obesity problem an all the fat people wont fart! That would decrease global warming considerably.
Permalink mikeg [Member] on August 17, 2009 at 13:12
@tree hugger,

you seem to have fallen into the same trap as many folks -- that is, assuming that temperature or weather in any one locale is indicative in any way of whether global warming is occurring or not. but it's called "global" warming, not "midwest American states" warming, for a reason.

fact is, the ten warmest years on record all occurred between 1997 and 2008:

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2008/

this shows a clear trend of increasing GLOBAL temperatures over the past couple decades. an even more stark representation of how drastic the warming has been over the past 125 years are these color-coded maps that display the long-term progression of global surface temperatures from 1880 to 2008:

http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a003500/a003596/

this is the kind of data on which the science of global warming is based, not the temperature in Boise last week.
Permalink Richard Heng [Visitor] on August 21, 2009 at 19:25
I dont know how long we can last, but its time for us to wake up

Singapore Shopping
Flexarite

You must have an account and be logged in to post comments. Log in or create an account for the Greenpeace member center here.

About Me

melanie_d
Anchorage, AK USA



Contact Me >

Invite melanie_d to your Personal Activist Network

Syndicate XML

Categories




702 H Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 462-1177
youtube   myspace   facebook