Greenpeace

The Christian Science Monitor sounds unsure of the "cap-and-trade" concept. In the April 12th issue, Mark Clayton writes, "At least half a dozen bills in Congress aim to solve the problem by letting the market decide through 'cap-and-trade' systems. But those systems...include widely varying details whose impact is largely unknown." Wonderful. Meanwhile, there is a goofy column in The Metro that advocates for climate change. I caught a glimpse of this column that said essentially, why not? Time for a change. A lot of people read The Metro.