Industry Lobbyists Stall Critical Chemical Legislation

| More
rick_hind

As Congress finally begins to move chemical security legislation in the House Homeland Security and Energy & Commerce Committees, Greenpeace is urging everyone to weigh in and remind Congress what they have to do before October 4th when the fatally flawed temporary law expires.  A blue-green coalition of more than 50 organizations including the Steelworkers, UAW, Teamsters, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Sierra Club, U.S. Public Interest Group are also working hard.

For almost eight years this legislation has been held up by a coalition of chemical industry lobbyists representing giants like Dow and DuPont, the Bush administration and their allies in Congress.  In 2008 the industry deployed some 200 lobbyists spending millions to successfully stall this legislation for the seventh year in a row.  In the same seven years, hundreds of chemical plants have converted to safer chemicals, eliminating risks to millions of Americans.  Unfortunately at the current rate it could take 70 years to eliminate these hazards at the nation’s highest risk plants.

skull and crossbones banner


This year the chemical lobby is at it again. As you can see by their March 2nd letter to Congress, they are obsessed with killing legislation that could require any chemical plant to use safer chemicals that will eliminate the risk of a Bhopal magnitude disaster. Instead they are pressuring Congress to make the temporary law permanent. They ghost wrote that law in 2006 in a successful effort to derail stronger legislation. That “law” actually PROHIBITS the government from requiring the use of safer chemicals and EXEMPTS thousands of chemical facilities completely, including all water treatment plants.

Like a wolf in sheep’s clothing, the largest chemical companies are pretending to have a kinder, gentler side in contrast to the more publicly dogmatic wing that signed the March 2nd letter. They apparently think Congress is as naive as Little Red Riding Hood because this “kinder” wolf is the primary lobbying arm of Dow and DuPont, aka the American Chemistry Council (ACC). By not signing the March 2nd letter the ACC companies hope Congress will forget that they spear headed the industry lobbying over the last eight years that either killed, delayed or weakened chemical security legislation.  As you can see by the flow chart, ACC leaders Dow and DuPont are also prominent members of many of the hard-line lobbying groups that signed the March 2nd letter.  

Now not all the companies in these lobbying groups necessarily agree with the March 2nd letter. The railroads are also members of some of these groups but in February 2008, the Association of American Railroads released a statement saying: "It's time for the big chemical companies to do their part to help protect America. They should stop manufacturing dangerous chemicals when safer substitutes are available. And if they won't do it, Congress should do it for them.

The railroads are the largest shippers of the poison gases that make them and U.S. chemical plants among the most vulnerable terrorist targets in the U.S.  Shipping these gases represents less than 0.3 percent of their business but it’s 80 percent of their liability.

dow chemical mapRecognizing that major companies such as Dow and DuPont also have enormous liability exposure, we sent their CEOs extensively documented letters citing the millions of people that Dow and DuPont plants put at risk and urged them to join other companies in switching to safer available chemicals.  We also asked them to follow the railroad’s example and break with the industry groups lobbying AGAINST legislation that could ensure that high risk plants convert to safer chemicals.  I wish we could say we’ve reached a break through with them but I can say we’ve definitely gotten their attention at the highest levels.

Remember, help is on the way.  It’s in your own emails, calls and letters to Congress. The two House Committees taking up this legislation understand the stakes but they need to hear from you today if they’re going to keep the proverbial wolf away from the door.  If we’re successful this summer the next stop will be the House floor, hopefully no later than September.  In the meantime the U.S. Senate will have to get serious because the chemical lobby doesn’t take the summer off.

--Rick

 

Comments:

Permalink rational [Member] on June 15, 2009 at 13:50
Rick,

Wow... 3% of their business represents 80% of their risk?! Yet they're trying to PROTECT that scenario! Either you're wrong, or they're stupid.

Does Greenpeace use spokespeople who are ignorant of Greenpeace’s best interests? …Of course not. Should Greenpeace “lobbyists” be dismissed solely on the reputation of their client?

Is it possible that the chemical lobbyists are the best qualified to promote the well being of their clients? You seem certain that the chemical companies’ best interest doesn’t coincide with our best interests. Are you suggesting that those companies are ignorant of the massive risks you mention?

I repeat: Either you’re wrong, or they’re stupid. Something tells me they’re not stupid…
Permalink fordspark701 [Visitor] on June 15, 2009 at 14:11
Me too I want to join the group to urge the two giant company to switch to safer chemical. I hoping that the congress are looking for the interest of more people anf our environment.
Permalink rick_hind [Member] on June 15, 2009 at 14:35
American railroads no longer want to ship poison gas due to the enormous liability. Because they are a monopoly they are obligated to carry them. Union Pacific railroad recently challenged this in a petition to the government to free them from shipping chlorine gas. They are not alone, since 9/11 more than two hundred chemical plants have switched to safer chemical processes. Their action eliminated risks to millions of Americans and will make their business more sustainable. Unfortunately at this rate of conversion it will take decades to eliminate these risks at the 3,400 most hazardous plants. That's why the railroad's are saying, if the industry doesn't convert, "Congress should do it for them." That sounds smart to me.
Permalink rick_hind [Member] on June 27, 2009 at 11:44
In his Senate floor statement introducing strong chemical plant security legislation in 2006, President Obama
said, “We cannot allow chemical industry lobbyists to dictate the terms
of this debate. We cannot allow our security to be hijacked by corporate
interests."

You must have an account and be logged in to post comments. Log in or create an account for the Greenpeace member center here.

About Me

rick_hind
Washington, DC USA



Contact Me >

Invite rick_hind to your Personal Activist Network

Syndicate XML

Categories




702 H Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 462-1177
youtube   myspace   facebook