Lead in Toys is So 10 Years Ago

09/17/07

Lead in Toys is So 10 Years Ago

This lead in toys story will not go away. And it turns out its been going for like 10 years.

In 1996 Greenpeace published a report titled: Lead and Cadmium in Vinyl Children's Products. So we don't have the same PR cache for simple headlines as People magazine, but hey at least you know what it's about.  I'll summarize the summary for you.

 . . . or just write it out," A Greenpeace investigation revealed the presence of hazardours levels of lead and cadmium in a variety of vinyl consumer products, including items specifically designed and marketed for children. The study was spurred by the discovery of hazardous lead levels in vinyl blinds and associated lead poisoning of children in 1996. Since no government agency appeared to be investigating whether other vinyl consumer products might also pose a similar health risk, Greenpeace initiated a nationwide study of vinyl products." 

Here are some of the findings of our investigation:

  • Lead- and cadmium-containing vinyl products are readily available from some of the nation's leading retailers, including Kmart, Wal-Mart, Target, and Toys R Us.
  • Children are a marketing target. Products featured Barbie, Minnie and Mickey Mouse, 101 Dalmations, Michael Jordan, Bugs Bunny, and various other Looney Tunes characters.
  • Lead -containing vinyl products are common. The investigation began by testing vinyl children's products purchased in Chicago. Twenty-one percent of the vinyl consumer prodcuts examined contained greater than 100 parts-per-million lead (28 out of 131). Since all of the items were purchased at national chain stores, this high percentage may reflect the US frequency for lead-containing vinyl products.
  • Lead- and cadmium-containing vinyl products are widely available in California, despite its stringent regulation fo carcinogens and reproductive toxins. A representative sample of items grossly exceeded limits for exposure to lead and cadmium set by the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, also known as Proposition 65.
  • Both lead and cadmium are readily available for ingestion by children. Lead and cadmium were released to the surfaces of products as they aged. Lead also became available under conditions that mimic swallowing.

And just in case you're thinking well of course it's not the same exact products, think again . . . a Barbie accessory tent pole was one of the products found to have high levels of lead. One product Matell is currently recalling  ---- Barbie accessories  . . alright I'll give this one to them the lead paint is on the dog and cat accessories, not tent poles. My mistake.

What the hell is going on? Why are families suffering today from a problem that was highlighted to this industry 10 years ago? What's wrong with these people? And why are these people completely satisfied with sacrificing children's lives for money? Sometimes I have a hard time wrapping my head around these things. Maybe they just do this stuff because they can.

 
Renee. 

 

Comments:

Permalink fourwilsons [Visitor] on October 23, 2007 at 15:51
As a concerned parent, I'm just not sure how you know what is safe and what isn't. Despite our continuing request for wooden toys only, we often receive plastic toys from well-meaning friends and relatives. The one group of toys we've allowed the kids to keep are the Fisher-Price Little People. The kids just love them. I have tried repeatedly to find out what they are made of keep coming up blank. I even called Fisher-Price and they said they could not reveal that information. Do I have to throw them out? Argghh. Toy manufacturers should be looking out for children and working with parents. Instead they are just looking out for their profits.
Permalink phys431 [Visitor] on November 21, 2007 at 12:35
It is possible (and practical) to discern if your children's toys are safe. GET THEM TESTED. There are laboratories that are listed in the yellow pages that can perform lead testing. One will want either an XRF (X-Ray Flourescence) testing or FAS (Flame Absorption Spectroscopy) testing. Or you can just tell the lab to test for lead-based paint. The former is ok if the surface of the painted area is FLAT AND larger than a postage stamp. Otherwise it's not practical or possible (or reliable). Otherwise, scrape off the paint (an area the size of a postage stamp) and collect that in a plastic bag. Submit that bag, or the toy if testing by XRF. The cost for either (provided you go to the lab) should be $10-20. The XRF can be done (if they are available) in a couple minutes. The FAS might take some time, so tell them how soon you want results (12 hrs, 24, 48, 72, etc).

If it comes back greater that .06% by weight, your toy is not safe according to the FTC. Now wasn't that a good $10-20 well spent? Save the lab results. Make two copies and send one back to the toy maker and demand a refund. Save the other (and the toy) for the press. A law suit would *not* be productive, just take your refund, toss the toys, and tell your friends to do the same.

You must have an account and be logged in to post comments. Log in or create an account for the Greenpeace member center here.

Bloggers


Rick

Help Us Stop the Toxic Threat

Staff Weblog


<  January 2009  >
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Search

Syndicate

RSS  RSS Feed

powered by
b2evolution

Greenpeace footer navigation bar
702 H Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20001 (800) 326-0959